PDF Download Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), by James K.A. Smith
Book Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith is one of the precious worth that will certainly make you consistently rich. It will certainly not suggest as abundant as the cash offer you. When some people have lack to deal with the life, people with lots of publications in some cases will be smarter in doing the life. Why ought to be e-book Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith It is actually not implied that book Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith will give you power to reach every little thing. Guide is to review as well as what we suggested is guide that is checked out. You can likewise see just how guide qualifies Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith and also varieties of publication collections are giving right here.
Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), by James K.A. Smith
PDF Download Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), by James K.A. Smith
Utilize the innovative technology that human develops now to discover guide Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith easily. But initially, we will ask you, just how much do you like to review a book Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith Does it always up until finish? Wherefore does that book check out? Well, if you actually love reading, aim to review the Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith as one of your reading compilation. If you only read guide based upon need at the time and also unfinished, you should attempt to such as reading Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith first.
It is not secret when linking the composing abilities to reading. Reviewing Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith will certainly make you obtain even more sources as well as sources. It is a manner in which can enhance how you ignore and understand the life. By reading this Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith, you could greater than what you obtain from various other book Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith This is a widely known book that is published from popular publisher. Seen type the author, it can be trusted that this publication Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith will give lots of motivations, concerning the life as well as encounter as well as everything inside.
You could not need to be uncertainty regarding this Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith It is simple method to get this book Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith You can merely check out the distinguished with the link that we offer. Below, you can acquire guide Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith by on-line. By downloading Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith, you could find the soft file of this publication. This is the exact time for you to start reading. Even this is not printed book Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith; it will exactly give more benefits. Why? You may not bring the printed book Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith or pile the book in your home or the workplace.
You could carefully include the soft data Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith to the gadget or every computer unit in your office or residence. It will help you to always proceed reading Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith every single time you have downtime. This is why, reading this Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith does not give you troubles. It will provide you crucial resources for you that wish to start creating, blogging about the similar book Speech And Theology: Language And The Logic Of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), By James K.A. Smith are different publication area.
God is infinite, but language finite; thus speech would seem to condemn Him to finitude. In speaking of God, would the theologian violate divine transcendence by reducing God to immanence, or choose, rather, to remain silent? At stake in this argument is a core problem of the conditions of divine revelation. How, in terms of language and the limitations of human understanding, can transcendence ever be made known? Does its very appearance not undermine its transcendence, its condition of unknowability?
Speech and Theology posits that the paradigm for the encounter between the material and the divine, or the immanent and transcendent, is found in the Incarnation: God's voluntary self-immersion in the human world as an expression of His love for His creation. By this key act of grace, hinged upon Christs condescension to human finitude, philosophy acquires the means not simply to speak of perfection, which is to speak theologically, but to bridge the gap between word and thing in general sense.
- Sales Rank: #1814269 in Books
- Published on: 2002-09-29
- Released on: 2002-08-01
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 9.21" h x .46" w x 6.14" l, .69 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 200 pages
About the Author
James K.A. Smith is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Loyola Marymount University in California.
Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful.
Words as Things Bridging the Gap
By Jacob
The problem is how can finite language speak about the infinite God. In answering this question, Smith gives a tour-de-force of continental philosophy.
Concept and Violence
In modernity the concept becomes a means of dominating and seizure (5). Absolute knowledge erases differance.
“If the object of theoretical articulation is in some way radically exterior to language (God, differance, pretheoretical experience), then every unveiling of it in language will fail to produce the object” (6). “Concepts” make claims to totalization. In modernity one who has the concept of “a thing” has the thing. Concept is domination. Knowledge is knowledge only insofar as it “seizes” the thing and has complete certainty.
Violence of Immanence: The French Critique
Husserl and Heidegger had privileged immanence over transcendence. If the phenomenon has to appear within these horizons of knowing, it can never give itself from itself. Marion suggests, rather, reducing it to pure givenness and opening the space for revelation.
The violence of the concept: revisited
problem: how can transcendence appear and how can we speak of that which defies description? “Factical lived experience, the Other’s consciousness, and God all point to sites where description is at a loss” (43). Factical lived experience is always pretheoretical. The only way for the transcendent to appear is for it to take the properties of phenomena.
Praise and Confession: How (not) to speak in Augustine
signs and things: Signs are words; things are other than words. Smith and Augustine say words are not things (114), but in Hebrew debar also means thing. Augustine does allow that words can become things when understood iconically (123). Interior transcendence: self (also unbridgeable to the Other); metaphor is of depth, not height.
Praise bridges the verbal gap. Does not reduce God to concept, but maintains his alterity (128).
Incarnational Logic
Can truth be learned? No, per Plato, it can only be recollected. Truth on this account is timeless and cannot enter the particularities of history. Platonism is a theologia gloria. Writing as image of speech (cf Derrida on mediation and signs). But even speech is mediated at the origin
Scale of being
*images are appearances; “fall from being”
*Participation (ascent) and Incarnation (descent) are antithetical
*Salvation as achieving dis-embodiment (Laws 12.959a-d)
The Logic of Incarnation is a logic of don-nation, of giving (receiving from the outside). Contrast with Platonic recollection (Republic 518b-c).
Observations: Smith critiques Jean-Luc Marion as remaining within the ontology of estrangement. Grace perfects/completes nature = revealed theology (eucharist?) completes phenomenology. This might correlate with jlm’s emphasis on the icon (points beyond). Same as pagan magic, though.
Criticism: Smith’s solution to the problem is simple enough: God must condescend to us and in order to maintain the bounds of phenomenology, must meet us as phenomenon. Easy enough and no argument here. Something bugs me, though, in that he seems to think that God needs a mediating concept. Not saying that is wrong, but..
14 of 14 people found the following review helpful.
How to speak about God
By Tedd Steele
In this book, Smith grapples with how one ought to (or can) speak about God. The problem he deals with is one from phenomenology. If something is transcendent (as is God), then it cannot be conceptualized or spoken of without doing violence to its transcendence. Essentially, we cannot speak of something that is wholly other without making it immanent, even if only in our speech. Yet this speech does not do justice to God. The other option is not to speak, but this does not seem like such a good option either. Following the young Heidigger and Augustine, Smith develops an incarnational model of speech. Such speech does not violate transcendence, but points beyond itself to the greater reality (God). Further, it does not do violence because the transcendent One (God) initiated the speech. This is a difficult read if you are not familiar with French Deconstructionist philosophers like Derrida, Marion, and Levinas, but it is well worth the effort.
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful.
Fresh Air...
By Denise J. Mcpherson
Mark my words: in time JKA Smith's work will reverberate throughout the barren wasteland otherwise known as the Evangelical `academy'. He is one of the few out there in Evangelicaland who is doing stimulating, innovative work (perhaps along with Vanhoozer, McGrath, Wright, etc.). I begin with this affirmation because 1) I believe it, and 2) I love this book in spite of the critical remarks that follow. While I emphatically sympathize with his general strategy, his argument rests on an aporetic knot that he does not quite traverse without slipping:
His appeal to Levinas and Marion in support of his thesis is severely problematic, even after he critiques their notion of revelation. Those critiques somewhat miss the point, in that it amounts to positing the need for `conditions of reception' for revelation. Smith writes after quoting Levinas: *But still we must ask: in what way can the Wholly Other be revealed? Must not every revelation be received? (159)* In this whole paragraph, Smith confuses the event of the other in Levinas as an `appearance', delivering a content that requires conditions of reception, intelligibility, and so forth. For Levinas, the other precisely does not appear: the other appears as non-appearing, as enigma, as trace. The event of the face does not *reveal* information, or content to be assimilated within a structure of comprehension. (Levinas does not in fact regress to pre-critical metaphysics.) The relation is one of non relation: the other resists determination in that its content overflows its concept: this overflowing, taken with the trace, inscribes, elects, and constitutes ethical subjectivity; it signals an absolute passivity prior to even the minimal spontaneity, or merely relative passivity, implied by `conditions of reception'.
Smith forgets or ignores Levinas's theme of the TRACE. This is why Levinas is not a good resource for Smith's project. The alterity that irrupts in the face (in TI) and in Saying (OB) appears as trace of a past that was never present, i.e. a trace that (in principle) cannot be INCARNATED. The ethical trauma Levinas thematizes does not require a structure of reception beyond the jouissance of the existent, its affective being in its self-sameness. The relation to the other is traumatic precisely in that it `elects', it opens the same to responsibility precisely against its own inclinations. It constitutes the self's very singularity! The height and destitution of the other are the tropes for the passing of the trace. I am not as familiar with Marion, the description of the *religious phenomenon* as displacing and overwhelming the conditions of appearance bears the Levinasian influence. We should ask: do we really want God to `appear' in the specific phenomenological sense? Smith's appeal to Kierkegaard's paradox is a bit problematic too. The incarnation, for Kierk, does not appear in the phenomenological sense, but precisely burst the bounds of appearing and comprehension, it defies assimilation into Hegelian (or Husserlian) intelligibility. It would seem to me that the Incarnation must remain an offense, Christ must remain `incognito' to the lights of Reason or a (putatively) neutral epistemology. Or else faith would not be needed.
Of course: Smith's point is that in the Incarnation, God *condescends* to man in Christ. But this condescension will only ever appear as idolatrous and mythic to the neutral philosophical eye; which is why to that eye, God will only ever `appear' as an opening or irruption, as a whisper or shudder. Any more, and we're in the region of faith and the undecidability it presupposes. The theological opposition he seeks to mediate - immanence/transcendence - is aporetic and should remain so.
This touches on another confusion I had: Smith makes the claim that Christian theology needs Christian philosophy, i.e. reflection on method that exceed the regional specificity of theology. If this philosophy is indeed `Christian', i.e. post-faith philosophy, what need does it have of phenomenology? Why critique Marion and Levinas if one is already out over the abyss, and when this is precisely what the seek to effect (rather than regress to onto-theology)? Indeed, the critique seems to beg the question, in that Lev and Marion are operating on the terrain of the phenomenological tradition that brackets the position Smith assumes.
All in all, in spite (or perhaps because) of my critical questions, I love this book. This is a book that's worth reading, worth arguing with, and worth critiquing; a book that demonstrates that broadly orthodox theology can do more than incessantly recite the same slogans and oppositions. Smith is asking the right questions, pointing us in essential trajectories, and opening a site for theological reflection that moves beyond the Biblicism and positivism of so much Evangelical theology. From *Fall of Interpretation* to this book, Smith is trailblazing a new mood of inquiry and questioning. We hope that his work gains a wide reading!!! God knows, Evangelicalism is in need of legible, creative, effective, insightful thinking. Thanks Jamie!
Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), by James K.A. Smith PDF
Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), by James K.A. Smith EPub
Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), by James K.A. Smith Doc
Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), by James K.A. Smith iBooks
Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), by James K.A. Smith rtf
Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), by James K.A. Smith Mobipocket
Speech and Theology: Language and the Logic of Incarnation (Routledge Radical Orthodoxy), by James K.A. Smith Kindle
No comments:
Post a Comment